<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/RSS">
  <title>Other scientific papers</title>
  <link>http://www.demo-net.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
       The collection of scientific eParticipation references is compiled by DEMO-net members.
If you want to add a reference, please select the respective content type in "add item". Please familiarize yourself with the BibTex types of objects in order to choose the right content type.
If you want to import a reference, use the icon above.
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2008-09-30T08:28:57Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/logo.jpg"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abbott2000"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abbott2001"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AbdulrazzakTarik2003"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abrash2005"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Ackerly2003"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Afonso1996"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Agre2002"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Aidemark2003"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Aikens1998"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AinsworthHardyEtAl2005"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Al-Kodmany2000"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Albrecht2006"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AlperinSchultz2003"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AlsopWills2001"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AndersonFelici2005"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abbott2000">        <title>Distributed governance at the WTO-WIPO: An evolving model for open-architecture integrated governance</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abbott2000</link>        <description>&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;WTO governance has traditionally reflected the interests of producers  channeled through government trade negotiators. The producer-driven  governance model is not suited to the highly integrated international  society of the 21st century. The WTO governance structure should  be adapted to account for more diverse interests, including those  of marginalized developing countries, NGOs, and individuals. One  aspect of this adaptation should involve more highly integrated relations  between the WTO and other multilateral institutions. The inter-institutional  relationship that has evolved between the WTO and the World Intellectual  Property Organization (WIPO) since the conclusion of the Uruguay  Round evidences a number of characteristics that might usefully form  the basis for relations between the WTO and other international organizations.  The WTO-WIPO relationship effectively enhances the breadth of subject  matter interests and the administrative capacity of each organization,  and it provides a suitable forum for the negotiation of incremental  and experimental intellectual property rules that: are needed in  response to technological change. A second aspect of institutional  adaptation concerns increasing the participation of wider segments  of international society in multilateral rule-making. The WIPO Internet  Domain Name Process was a unique governance exercise that employed  elements of direct democracy at thr international level and the management  of an organizational bureaucracy (the WIPO International Bureau).  This type of process might usefully be employed in other contexts,  such as by the FAO/WHO in developing health and safety guidelines  in connection with genetically modified organisms (GMOs).&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-06-16T11:37:34Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abbott2001">        <title>Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: lessons from China and Malaysia</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abbott2001</link>        <description>It is a commonly held view that, given the unique characteristics  of the internet, it provides real opportunities for democratisation  and political transformation, especially in societies where freedom  of speech and expression is constrained by government controls. This  article challenges this assumption by examining the impact of the  internet in Asia with specific reference to China and Malaysia. In  particular the article argues that to understand the impact of the  internet on developing economies it is essential to examine the political  economy of the internet-locally, regionally and globally. While the  net may provide a new medium for dissent and opposition, its impact  is offset by two principal factors. First, the existence of a marked  digital divide between North and South (as well as the discrepancies  that exist within specific countries in terms of gender, education  and wealth) and second, by growing commercialisation.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:04Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AbdulrazzakTarik2003">        <title>A path analytic study of the attitude toward e-government in Lebanon</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AbdulrazzakTarik2003</link>        <description>The last two years have seen the growing interest in e-commerce and  e-government in Lebanon. Through a review of literature and related  studies, critical factors in peoples' attitude toward participation  in e-government are uncovered. Empirical evidence indicates that  Lebanese people are provided today with automated systems but they  lack awareness of e-government. The cognitive dimension awareness  is significantly related to the conative dimension intention to use  e-government while the affective dimension feelings is less significant.  The findings of the study reaffirm the importance of investigating  future variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:04Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abrash2005">        <title>Digital democracy, digital history: 9-11 and after</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Abrash2005</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Ackerly2003">        <title>Lessons from Deliberative Democratic Theory for Building Global Civil Society</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Ackerly2003</link>        <description>Discusses insights from political theory and social criticism and  the development of their import for the design of an Internet-based  deliberative institution of global civil society. Models of the deliberative  democratic theory; Criticisms on deliberative democratic theory;  Reasons for a deliberative theorist to be concerned on the Internet's  impact on democracy; Use of Internet-based communication technologies  in deliberative democracy.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-11T13:17:13Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Inproceedings Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Afonso1996">        <title>The Internet and the community in Brazil: background, issues, and options</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Afonso1996</link>        <description>The Internet in Brazil is experiencing explosive growth. Spawned by  a newsmedia-driven public interest which began in early 1994, this  growth has taken unique paths. In a country where the entire data  communications and telephone services infrastructure is under a state  monopoly, Internet services to final users are scattered through  hundreds of private providers of all sizes, while Internet backbones  operated by transnational companies are being installed to compete  with a state-funded backbone and a state-owned backbone. This article  describes nongovernmental networking activity and how it evolved  from a purely academic network to one serving a much larger public</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Agre2002">        <title>Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Agre2002</link>        <description>Illustrates how the amplification model can be used in the analysis  of the Internet's role in politics. Use of technology in the service  of goals, strategies and relationships organized by the institution;  Development of social networks and ways that technology is used to  bind people together into a polity; Development of social networks.ABSTRACT  FROM AUTHOR Research on the Internet's role in politics has struggled  to transcend technological determinism the assumption, often inadvertent,  that the technology simply imprints its own logic on social relationships.  An alternative approach traces the ways, often numerous, in which  an institution's participants appropriate the technology in the service  of goals, strategies, and relationships that the institution has  already organized. This amplification model can be applied in analyzing  the Internet's role in politics. After critically surveying a list  of widely held views on the matter, this article illustrates how  the amplification model might be applied to concrete problems. These  include the development of social networks and ways that technology  is used to bind people together into a polity.ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Aidemark2003">        <title>A knowledge perspective on e-democracy</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Aidemark2003</link>        <description>This paper takes an information systems development perspective on  e-democracy. A case study in the area of e-democracy, a number of  different types of information systems applications, is presented.  These are discussed from three perspectives on knowledge, (cognitive,  social, and critical), using an analytical framework that is based  on some general direction in the area of knowledge management. The  lesson of the case study is that full support from all these perspectives  are needed to make IS an effective support to democratic processes.  The analysis shows that it is not a technical problem, most types  of support are readily available and in use. There is an insight  in the area that success rests on a match between IS, understanding  democratic processes, and peoples' expectations. The trouble, it  seems, is to convert this into a system development perspective.  Here findings from knowledge management could provide support.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Incollection Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Aikens1998">        <title>A personal history of Minnesota Electronic Democracy, 1994</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Aikens1998</link>        <description>This article is an account of the early history of Minnesota Electronic  Democracy (MN E-Democracy). The project was among the first political  sites on the Internet and featured the first online debates involving  political candidates at the state and national level. The focus of  the article reports on the process of constructing the project, the  structure of the public forums in which approximately 700 citizens  participated, and the thinking behind the configuration of the online  debates, which were forwarded into the public forums, creating a  successful electronic town hall. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AinsworthHardyEtAl2005">        <title>Online Consultation: E-Democracy and E-Resistance in the Case of the Development Gateway</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AinsworthHardyEtAl2005</link>        <description>To explore the implications of the Internet for the relationship between  organizational communication and power; this article compares two  online forums established in response to the introduction of a new  e-organization: the Development Gateway. The article analyzes postings  to the forums to explore the capacity of the Internet to foster democracy,  and to investigate how power and resistance are exercised through  this medium. Findings show that, rather than equate resistance with  participation, as some models of democracy do, the dynamics of power  and resistance are more complex, and resistance and power can take  participative and nonparticipative forms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Al-Kodmany2000">        <title>Public Participation: Technology and Democracy</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Al-Kodmany2000</link>        <description>Computerized visualization methods offer planners and architects some  new ways to support and facilitate democratic decision-making. However,  the uses of this technology in public participation are just beginning  to be explored. This paper describes a community planning process  in which a combination of high- and low-tech visualization methods  a Geographic Information System (GIS) and a human artist was used  to increase public participation and draw out local knowledge.ABSTRACT  FROM AUTHOR</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Albrecht2006">        <title>Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/Albrecht2006</link>        <description>One of the core elements of the vision of Ã¢â¬Ëelectronic democracyÃ¢â¬â¢  is the hope that the Internet permits free and equal access to political  debates. However, experiences with online discourse challenge this  view. The digital divide being one obstacle to participation, even  more interesting is the fact that online communication is constrained  in ways similar to the offline world. This paper attempts to reassess  the question of whether the Internet makes political debate more  open to voices that are normally not heard in the political field.  Based on empirical evidence from a large-scale online deliberation,  it analyses who participates in political debates on the Internet  and whose views are represented. The results challenge both the optimistic  and the sceptical view on electronic democracy. A theoretical model  is developed that is able to explain the results. It extends current  research by including the cultural practices of technology use and  the specific effects of large-scale communication in the analysis.  Though preliminary this model can help to inform the designers of  online deliberations to make the most of their democratic potential.ABSTRACT  FROM AUTHOR</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Article Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AlperinSchultz2003">        <title>E-Democracy: Legislative-Constituent Communications in Minnesota and Wisconsin</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AlperinSchultz2003</link>        <description>Communications between elected officials and their constituents is a major concern for political scientists trying to understand the nature of representation in a democracy such as the United States. In this study the impact of e-mail on communications between constituents and state legislators is examined. Much has been written in the popular media about dramatic changes to society resulting from new technologies such as the Internet and e-mail. In addition, studies in the political science research literature have examined such topics as the use of new communication technologies by citizen activists, by state level political parties, by interest groups in their issue campaigns, and by member of Congress. However, little research has been done on the use of e-mail in communications between state legislators and their constituents. In 1997, one of the primary investigators in this current project conducted a survey of Minnesota&amp;rsquo;s state legislators on the use of e-mail in the Minnesota legislative. Since the original study was conducted, significantly more citizens and legislators nationwide have gained access to e-mail and the Internet and use them on a regular basis. To examine these changes and their impact on legislator-constituent relations over time, a follow-up survey of Minnesota legislators was conducted in the summer of 2002. In addition, to broaden the focus of the study and to be able to make some cross state comparisons, Wisconsin state legislators were also surveyed in the summer of 2002. The 1997 study concluded that at least at the time &amp;ldquo;e-mail may have been oversold as an effective tool of communication between citizen and legislator. Instead the best way for a citizen to get her point across is the old-fashioned way &amp;ndash; send a letter or visit her state legislator.&amp;rdquo; The 2002 survey suggests that office visits and sending a letter are still seen as the most effective way to get one&amp;rsquo;s point across to your legislator. E-mail is also seen as an effective tool of communication between citizen and legislator, but only under certain circumstances. If a legislator recognizes that the e-mail was personally written by a constituent, it is seen as almost as effective a method of communication as sending a handwritten or typed letter via the postal service. However, &amp;ldquo;the problem with e-mail,&amp;rdquo; as one legislator for Minnesota put it, &amp;ldquo;is that one does not have the time to respond to non-constituents, but there is no easy, non-offensive way to sort out the &amp;lsquo;political spammers.&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-11T12:53:14Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Inproceedings Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AlsopWills2001">        <title>Technology and democracy: a panacea for government?</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AlsopWills2001</link>        <description>This paper considers whether communications theory can help us to  understand better the social and juridical impacts of new telecommunications  services, particularly in relation to e-democracy and e-government</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:06Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Inproceedings Reference</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AndersonFelici2005">        <title>How democratic will e-democracy be?</title>        <link>http://www.demo-net.org/what-is-it-about/research-papers-reports-1/eparticipation-scientific-references/AndersonFelici2005</link>        <description>Recent developments (e.g., e-government, e-democracy, e-voting, etc.)  of the information society expose the limits of system security.  The ubiquitousness of information technology relies on stringent  system requirements. Although new technology addresses technical  problems and provides new challenges, new technology often gives  rise to new hazards. In order to identify mitigation actions, it  is necessary to understand diverse multidisciplinary aspects. The  complexity and multidisciplinary of information technology require  us to investigate new mechanisms that address general requirements  (e.g., trust, security, etc.). A debate on the problems arising in  particular information society scenarios would benefit from a broad  multidisciplinary audience. This panel advocates a multidisciplinary  debate on e-democracy: how democratic will e-democracy be?.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>neurothc</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-08-06T12:00:06Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Inproceedings Reference</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>

